Thoughtcrime Watch

The Home Secretary John Reid says that the system is not "secret surveillance" saying,
It's very public, it's interactive.Amazingly, he regards this as some sort of defence rather than a damning out of his own mouth.


Mr. Reid claims that the trade offs are well worth the candle and any fears of encroaching tyranny are mere paranoia because there is only a "minority who will be more concerned about what they claim are civil liberties intrusions". This is, of course, quite right. Why should the people have any fears as unseen, unaccountable eyes watch their every move from ubiquitous cameras and bark orders at them when they fail to follow the whimsical diktats of the Party? They should simply go about their lives in the comforting knowledge that people who know better than they will watch over them and save them from their fellow citizens or even themselves.After all, what could possibly go wrong?

2 Comments:
His face looks like all the foxes you can no longer legally hunt, there.
What the hell, Britain?
Maybe the system would be more palatable if next to the camera there was a big screen TV, not of Big Brother, but instead moderatly attractive women telling you to put your trash in the appropriate bin.
********************
About the visiplates in the fictional Distopias.
I always pictured thousands of cubicals with the watchers bored silly watching people with better lives then they had.
What if "watching" was a way to employ the unproductive members of society, like the Golchians in HGttG.
Forbidden to discuss thier jobs, they are all watching the same guy and don't know it.
He does.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home