Mr. Jim McLane, a former NASA engineer, claims that the most cost-effective way of carrying out a manned Mars mission is to send one man on a one-way trip.
That's "one way" as in "not planning on bringing him back," not "no guarantee of bringing him back." According to Mr. Lane,
When we eliminate the need to launch off Mars, we remove the mission’s most daunting obstacle.
Some aeroplane engineers had the same idea about landing gear, but that never proved very popular except with certain circles in the Imperial Japanese Navy.
Mr. McLane says that this approach is in keeping with the spirit of Charles Lindbergh or Captain Scott, who both took tremendous risks, but he overlooks the fact that Lindbergh was attempting to reach Paris, which had a good return liner service and was inhabited, albeit by Frenchmen, and Captain Scott and his men had no intention of taking up permanent residence at the South Pole. Even immigrants to the New World who had no plans to return home went with the tacit understanding that two-way trade was the point of the entire enterprise, not a dumping into a prison without hope of reprieve.
Counter proposals that just shooting the volunteer in the head is even more cost effective were not received gracefully.
Labels: Mars, Space, United States