|
There
seems to be a quantum leap when it comes to how people thought about
robots. They were either metallic creatures that were all
industrial-strength joints and claws or they were perfect imitations
of the human form. There never seemed to be any sort of an
intermediate phase; Robby the Robot to Helen O'lloy in one jump and
naught in between, which is odd to anyone who has taken even the most
casual look at how technology advances.
Take, for example, sound
recording. In the last century we went through any number of
different technologies and formats for recording and reproducing
sound. First there were wax phonograph cylinders, then bakelite
gramophone records, then vinyl LPs, wire recorders, tape,
stereophonic records, HiFi, cassette tapes, CDs, and MP3; and I
haven't begun to touch on all the ancillary and failed formats that
littered the roadway.
And yet, every time a
humanoid robot was trotted out, it was virtually indistinguishable
from human except for an irritating tendency to jerk its head and a
refusal to use contractions. You would think that things like
subtleties of skin texture, the play of muscle and bones under the
skin, facial expressions, or just being able to walk a straight line
would have given the engineers pause or resulted in a product that
resembled a department store mannequin more than Rita Hayworth.
But, nope. It was Tin Man to Twilight Zone stock character in
one go.
I suspect that part of
this is due to simple impatience.
Hugo Gernsback had that
aplenty. He was desperate for the future to show up and never
could quite grasp why it wasn't pounding on the door. After all,
he'd done the hard part and thought up the radioperforer, now it was
up to those sluggard engineers to deal with the boring details.
Same goes with robot women
Of course, the other
reason is more crass, but as it has to do with the average age of
science fiction readers, their sex, income, general status, and
probable social life, I shall leave that to your speculation.
|